�Technological advancements in specific fields of neuroscience receive implications for U.S. national security, and the intelligence operation community should monitor them closely, according to a new reputation from the National Research Council.
To do so effectively, intelligence organizations need analysts with advanced scientific preparation and resources to study neuroscience research and its technological applications, said Alice Young, a Texas Tech University professor of psychological science and a professor in the Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Young served on the commission that wrote the report released today (Aug. 13).
This will want adequate funding, intelligence analysts with advanced training in science and technology, and increased collaboration with the scientific biotic community, particularly academia.
"We were looking for at what kind of threats crataegus oxycantha arise from development of drugs for therapeutic use," Young aforementioned. "What if they were used in some unintended way? What is the future landscape of the type of threats that could come, and how could you detect these possible threats in the future as new drugs or medical technology become part of our wellness care?"
The commission attempted to uncover possible ways aesculapian technologies ranging from MRI and new drug treatments to improvements in prosthetics could be used against U.S. security, she said.
Could the virtual world created by gamers be secondhand to train enemy combatants faster? Could new drugs to avail people with attention shortage hyperactivity upset be ill-used to give an foe some sort of edge? Could the cosmetic Botox be used to surmount a piece of equipment that detects facial characteristics that masses display when they lie?
"These may be areas that the intelligence service experts would want to keep an eye on," she aforesaid. "I think it's important for national security that analysts think about what sort of issues whitethorn arise in the future as academic and commercial research continues to apace expand technology and its abilities."
The intelligence operation community has had a long-standing interest in monitoring global technology trends that could strike U.S. national security. However, in william Claude Dukenfield where applied science is forward-moving rapidly, the pace and breadth of research can overwhelm analysts. In accession, few intelligence activity analysts experience scientific skills specialized sufficiency to allow them to recognize significant advances in highly complex and emergent fields.
A 2005 National Research Council report card delved into the neuroscience field and identified respective research areas that could be of interest to the intelligence community: neurophysiological advances in detecting and measuring indicators of psychological states and intentions of individuals, the development of drugs or technologies that can alter human physical or cognitive abilities, advances in real time brain mental imagery, and breakthroughs in high-performance computing and neuronal modeling that could allow researchers to develop systems which mimic functions of the human brain, particularly the ability to organize disparate forms of data.
The field was sponsored by the Defense Intelligence Agency. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council ar private, not-for-profit institutions that provide scientific discipline, technology and health policy advice under a congressional charter. The National Research Council is the principal operating delegacy of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering.
Texas Tech University
212 Administration Bldg., Box 42022
Lubbock, TX 79409-2022
United States
http://www.ttu.edu
View do drugs information on Botox Cosmetic.
More info
